Ivanov: The agreement aims to make us a footnote in someone else’s version of history

-

With the Prespa Agreement, politicians, diplomats and bureaucrats will censor the textbooks you are writing or from which you teach, President Gjorge Ivanov said addressing professors and historians at the opening ceremony of the First National Conference on Byzantium and Mediation “Samuel’s State – 1,000 years after (1018-2018) “.

“In Article 8, point 5 provides for the establishment of a ‘Joint Interdisciplinary Committee of Experts on Historical, Archaeological and Educational Issues’. Even though this committee should consider the scientific interpretation of historical events objectively, it is, however, symptomatic that it should be done under the supervision of the foreign ministries of both countries. The authors of the Prespa Agreement, whoever they are, show either elemental ignorance of Balkan history or worrying indifference to the complex processes of building Balkan identities. Frankly, I do not know which of these two alternatives is worse,” said the president.

Ivanov compared the challenges of Samuel’s state to the challenges of the modern Macedonian state.

“These challenges are denial, non-recognition, attempts at blockade, isolation and misnomers. It depends on us whether we will preserve academic freedom or leave the future generations to inherit a censored and falsified history,” says Ivanov.

According to Ivanov, the Prespa Agreement denies the right to self-determine, and denies the right to freedom of opinion and expression, guaranteed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

“The Prespa Agreement aims to make us a footnote in someone else’s version of history, therefor closing the chapter on self-determination of the Macedonian people and its sovereign and independent Republic of Macedonia,” he adds.

Success in combating disinformation depends on a comprehensive approach from the whole of society

The session titled "Democracy at Risk: Fact-Checking and Content Moderation on Social Media—Facing Challenges by Creating Enabling Environment" discussed the state of fact-checking in the Western Balkans. Jona Plumbi, from the...

Election integrity in the age of TikTok and viral campaigns: How are information threats undermining the electoral process?

Monitoring the information space is a constant struggle. Information threats have always been an obstacle to democracy and free and fair elections throughout human history. However, with the advent of the...

A common approach and strategic communications must be the pillar of the fight against disinformation

Building bridges of cooperation. Sharing lessons from different experiences with malicious fake news. Creating strategic platforms. The necessity of strategic action. These are some of the main conclusions of the second...

Urgent harmonization of the regulatory framework in the Balkans with the Digital Services Act–crucial for the fight against disinformation

The lack of legal and institutional mechanisms to protect the digital space in the Balkans makes the region vulnerable to manipulation, disinformation, and foreign influence. While the European Union’s Digital Services...